An Awkward Dance: Nightlife and Urban Development (Lessons from Berlin)

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary
Berlin exemplifies the relationships between (sub)culture, identity, and the emergent knowledge economy like no other. Unique conditions, including the aftermath of two World Wars, a generation-long separation by the Berlin Wall, and a period of failed investment-led over-speculation, created a testbed for alternative cultures, local creativity, and entrepreneurialism. Today, the city is internationally renowned for its cultural diversity and its vibrant nightlife, both fundamental driving forces behind the city’s journey to becoming Europe’s center for the immaterial economy and new work. The club scene only recently found ways to measure and communicate its social and economic benefits to garner political support. While the city begins to recognize the financial and marketing value of its nightlife, district-level planning administration has been introducing stringent laws, regularly endangering the scene. Despite nightlife’s critical contribution to the cultural geography of the city, the local urban planning establishment often perceives both individual clubs and informal entertainment zones as urban hazards to be restricted and controlled. While a few academic voices call on city planners and policymakers to pay more attention to nightlife and its numerous benefits for the city, actors of the subcultural scene are getting involved in urban development themselves. Armed with resilience and resourcefulness stemming from years of practicing tactile urbanism, subcultural actors begin to become authors of locally sensitive solutions. While these projects quickly garner admiration for their inventiveness and popularity, urban planning administration and bureaucracy presents itself as the biggest hurdle to successful implementation. This presentation shares lessons learned from Berlin’s ambivalent relationship between subculture and urban planning, applicable to major cities around the world in search of strategies to partner with alternative culture to increase attractiveness and livability. It further calls for a less restrictive and more creative planning practice, which is not afraid of learning from different sources such as the nebulous but incredibly productive urban nightlife.
Abstract ID :
ISO456
Submission Type
Managing Partner
,
Office ParkScheerbarth

Similar Abstracts by Type

Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
ISO532
5: Smart futures and sustainability: planning for innovation
Case Study/Research Project
Ari Krisna Mawira Tarigan
ISO618
3: Liveable places and healthy cities: planning for people
Case Study/Research Project
Kate Holmquist
ISO59
3: Liveable places and healthy cities: planning for people
Case Study/Research Project
Amira Badran
ISO528
3: Liveable places and healthy cities: planning for people
Case Study/Research Project
Niken Prawestiti
ISO338
3: Liveable places and healthy cities: planning for people
Case Study/Research Project
Jeh Chan
ISO149
5: Smart futures and sustainability: planning for innovation
Case Study/Research Project
raana saffari
ISO324
3: Liveable places and healthy cities: planning for people
Case Study/Research Project
Shirley Maraya
ISO255
6: Changing environment and risks: planning for resilience
Case Study/Research Project
Manoranjan Ghosh
ISO568
2: Beside the megacity and the role of other cities and areas: planning for balance
Case Study/Research Project
Chensi Xu